Thursday, 19 March 2015

from paradise lost to frankenstein and furter : the creature lives ! as an elaborated in cultural studies in practise.

 From Paradise Lost  toFrankenstein and furter : the creature lives ! as an elaborated in  cultural studies in practice.

Name : Radha B. Ghevariya 

Std. : M.A. SEM-2

Sub : Cultural Studies

Roll no : 22 

Topic : From Paradise Lost  toFrankenstein and furter : the creature lives ! as an elaborated in  cultural studies in practice.

Submitted to : Smt. S. B. Gardi Department of English 

Introduction

#  what is culture?

              Culture refers to the cumulative  deposit of knowledge , experience, belief, values, attitudes, meanings, hierarchies, religion, notions of time , roles, spatial relations, concept of universe, and material object and possessions acquired by a group of people in the course  of generations through individual  and group striving.

         ‘ culture’ is the mode of producing meaning and ideas. This ‘mode’ is a negotiation over which meanings are valid. Elite culture control meanings because it control the terms of the debate and a culture is a way of life  of a group of people the behavior, beliefs, values, and symbols that they accept. generally without thinking about them and that are passed along by communication and imitation from  one generation to the next.

              Culture studies looks at mass or popular culture and everyday life. popular  culture is the culture of masses. A culture study argue  that culture is about  the meanings of community or society  generates cultural  studies  believes that  the ‘culture’  of communities  includes various  aspects like: Economics , Spiritual, Ideological, Erotic, and Political.

               Culture is not natural thing. it is production and consumption of  culture.emphsis on discourse and textually are at  Centre to cultural  studies . It  believe that we  cannot ‘read’ cultural after only within the aesthetic realm.

#  Manifestation of Culture at different level of depth

           Start Hall  work has been a trendsetter in cultural studies and inaugurates the field in  Britain. Hall’s essay of ‘ Encoding and Decoding’ set the scene for cultural studies of the media . the essay argued about meaning within the texts songs, painting, and t.v. soupstakes help  of cobles to organize ‘culture’ which makes a society is “ a cultured society”.

        Cultural studies is an academic field of critical theory and literary criticism initially introduced by British academics in 1964 and subsequently adopted by  allied academics throughout the  world. characteristically interdisciplinary cultural studies is an academic discipline aiding cultural researchers who theorize about the forces from which the whole of  humankind construct their daily lives. cultural studies is not a unified theory , but a diverse field of study encompassing many different approaches, methods and academic perspectives. distinct  from the breath , objective and methodology of cultural anthropology and ethic studies, cultural studies is focused upon the political  dynamics of contemporary culture and its historical foundations , conflicts and defining traits. researchers concentrate on how a particular medium or message relates to ideology , social class , nationality, ethnicity, sexuality, and/or  gender, rather than providing an  encyclopedic identification categorization or definition of a particular culture or area of the world.

# History

        The term was  used by Richard Hoggart in 1964. when he founded the Birmingham Centre for contemporary cultural studies or BCCCS. it has since became strongly associated with Stuart  Hall who succeeded Hoggart as director.

“ Culture is the great help out of a present difficulty, culture being a pursuit of our total perfection by means of getting to know , or all the matter we most concern the best which may thought and compare to turning a stream of fresh and free thought upon our stoack nation and habits which we followed stonchelly but mechanically”

# Culture is divided into three parts.

1)  Barbarians
2)  Philistines
3) Populace

#   what is cultural studies ?


             Cultural studies explores culture power and identity. in cultural studies , we analyze a wide variety of forms of cultural expression such as tv, film, advertising, literature, atr, and video games. as well as we study social and  cultural practices like shopping and social justice movements.


             Culture  has two aspect: the know meanings and directions, which its member are trained to; the new observations and meanings, which are offered and tested. these are the ordinary processes of human societies and human minds, and we see through them the nature of a culture:  that it is both the most ordinary common meanings and the finest individual meanings  we use the word a whole way of life—the common meanings; to mean the arts and learning—the special processes of discover and creative effort”
                                                                                          # Raymond William


              Cultural studies is an innovative interdisciplinary field of research and teaching that investigates the ways in which  “culture” creates and transforms individuals experience , everyday life , social relations and power . research and teaching in the field explores the relation between culture understood as human expressive and symbolic activities and culture understood as distinctive way of life. combining the strengths of the social sciences and the humanities, cultural studies draws on methods and theories from literary studies, sociology, communications studies, history, cultural anthropology and economics. by working across  the boundaries among these fields, cultural studies addresses new question and problems of today world. rather than seeking answers that will hold for all time cultural studies develops flexible tools that adapt to this rapidly changing world.

               Mary Shelley’s novel has morphed into countless forms in both highbrows and popular culture. her creation teaches as not to underestimate the power of youth culture.

              Mary Shelley novel has included various thing in various ways. Like Universal pictures, stage plays, hummer films, radio, toys, comics, stage, novels, key chains, clothing.......etc........

               Shelley’s creation teaches us not to underestimate the power of youth culture.


1)Revolutionary births :

                           Born like its creator in an age of revolution ,Frankenstein challenged accepted ideas of its day. As it has become increasingly commoditized by modern consumer culture , one wonders whether its original revolutionary spirit and its critique of scientific ,philosophical , political , and  gender issues have become obscured , or whether  instead its continuing transformation attests to its essential oppositional nature.
                  Today, as George Levine remarks, Frankenstein is,

“ A  vital metaphor , pecuniary appropriate to a culture  dominatedBy consumer technology , neurotically obsessed with ‘getting in Touch’ with its authentic self-frightened at what it is discovering”

                  Hardly a day goes by without our seeing an image or allusion to  Frankenstein , from CNN, description of Saddam Hussein as an “American – created Frankenstein”  to magazine articles that warm of genetically engineered “ Franken foods” test-tube babies and donning.

a) The Creature as proletarian :

                      Mary Shelley lived during times of great upheaval in Britain; not only was her own family fall of radical thinkers , but she also met many other such as Thomas Paine and William Blake.  Persy Shelley was thought of as a dangerous radical bent on labor reform and was spied upon by the government . In Frankenstein ,Mary Shelley’s own divisions between revolutionary ardor and fear of the  masses.

                     Who worried about the mob’s “excess of a virtuous feeling”, fearing its “sick destructiveness” many Shelley’s  creature is a political and moral paradox , both an innocent and a cold blooded murderer.

                    Monsters like the creature are indeed paradoxical. On the one hand they transgress against “ the establishment” ; if the monster survives he represents the defiance of death an image of survival , however disfigured . on the other hand we are reassured when we see that society can capture and destroy monsters.

                    Such dualism would explain the great number of Frankenstein amount movie that appeared during the cold war. But the creature’s rebellious nature is rooted far in the past. In the De Lacys shed he reads three  books, beginning with Paradise Lost . not only are the eternal questions about the ways of god and man in paradise  lost relevant to the creature’s predicament , but in Shelley’s time Milton’s epic poem was seen as timothy Morton puts it , as ,

“ A seminal  work  of republicanism and sublime that inspired
Many of  the romantics”

              The creature  next reads a volume from Plutarch’s lives , which in the early 19th  century was reads as,

“ A  classic republican text , admired in the Enlightenment by such writers as Rousseau”

               Goethe’s the sorrows of young whether , the creature’s third book , is the prototypical rebellious romantic novel. In short , says Morton ,

“the creature’s literary education is radical”

           But the creature’s idealistic education does him little good , and he has no chance of reforming society . his self-education is his even more tragic second birth into an entire culture impossible for him to inhabit , however well he  understand its great writings about freedom.

b) “A  Race of  devils”

                 Frankenstein may be analyzed in its portrayal of different “Races” .though the creature’s skin  is only described as yellow , it has been  constructed,

“ out of a cultural tradition of the threatening ‘other’- Whether troll or giant , gypsy or negro- from the Dark inner recess of xenophobic fear and loathing”

            Antislavery discourse had a powerful effect on the depiction of Africans in Shelley’s day , from gaudily  dressed exotics to naked objects of pity.

             Victor could be read as guilty slave master .interestingly, one of Mary Shelley’s letters mentions of an allusion to Frankenstein made on the floor of parliament by  Foreign secretary George cunning (1770-1827) ; speaking on march 16,1824. On the subject of proposed ameliorations of slave conditions in the West Indies :

“ To turn him loose in the manhood of his physical Strengths , in the maturity of his physical passion,  But in the infancy of his instructed reason would Be to raise up a creature resembling the splendid Fiction of a recent romance”
         
                But Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak describes the novel as a critique of empire and racism , pointing out that,

“ Social  engineering should not be based upon pure ,Theoretical , or natural – scientific reason alone…..”

     Frankenstein’s ,

“ Language of racism- the dark side of imperials Understood  as social mission combines  with the Hysteria of macule into the idiom of sexual Reproduction rather than subject constitution”

          The novel is “ written from the perspective of a narrator from below”

C) From Natural Philosophy to cyborg

                Today , in an age of genetic engineering , biotechnology , and cloning the most far reaching industrialization  of life forms to date Frankenstein is more relevant than ever.

                Development in science were increasingly critical to study during the romantic period , when a paradigm shift occurred from science as natural philosophy to science as biology , a crucial distinction in Frankenstein . as described in Frankenstein : penetrating the secrets of nature , an exhibit mounted in 2002 by the national library of medicine , mary Shelley attended public demonstrations of the effect of electricity on animal and human bodies , living and dead.

                  The experiment of Luigi Galvani (1737 – 98) , an Italian physicist and physician who discovered that he could use electricity to include muscle contractions , were among the scientific topics discussed in the Geneva Villa by Percy Shelly , Byron and Polidori.

                According to cultural critic Laura Kranzler , victor’s  creation of life and modern sperm banks and artifial wombs show a “ masculine  desire to claim female reproductively”.

                Frankenstein and its warnings about the hubris of science will be with us in the farture as science continues to question the  borders between life  and death between “viability” and “selective reduction” between living and life support.

2} The Frankenstein in popular culture : Fiction , Drama , Film , Television
         
               Broadly defined frankenphenes  demonstrate the extent of the novel’s presence in worlds cultures, as the encoding  of race and class in the 1824 canning speech in parliament in today’s global debates about such things as genetically engineered foods , and of course in fiction and other media.
              We end with a quick look at some of the thousands of retellings , parodies ,  and other selected frankenphenes as they have appeared in popular fiction , drama , film , and television.

A ) The Greatest Horror Story novel written

                         Frankenstein’s fictions peter hailing , editor of the indispensable Frankenstein  omnibus has called Frankenstein ,

“ the single greatest horror story novel ever written and the most widely influential in its genre”

           In renaissance Italy , a scientist constructs a mechanical man to ring the hours on a bell in a tall tower , but it turns instead upon its creator. American writer W.C.Morrow published “ The Surgeon’s experiment “ in the Argonaut in 1887 , in which an experimenter  revives a headless  corpse by attaching a mental head ;  there was a large cancellation of subscriptions in response . Frankenstein inspired the set of tales published in home brew magazine called “ the reanimator” (1921-22) by H.P.Lovercraft which later became a cult classic movie “ Herbert West : Reanimator”(1986) the saga of a young experimenter barred from medical school , who  practices unholy arts on the corpses of human beings and reptiles.

              There is surprisingly amount of Frankenstein inspired erotica , especially gay – and lesbian – oriented. Finally , there are the unclassifiable , such as Theodore Leberthon’s “ Demons of the film colony “, a strange reminiscence of  afternoon the Hollywood journalist spent with Boris Karloff and bela Lugosi published in  Weird Tales in 1932.

B) Frankenstein on the stage

               From his debut on the stage , the creature has generally  been made more horrific , and victor  has been assigned less blame most stage and screen versions are quite melodramatic , tending to eliminate minor  characters and  the entire frame structure in order to focus upon murder and mayhem.

            On the 19th  century stage the creature was composite of frightening makeup and human qualities . he could even appear clownish , recalling  Shakespeare’s caliban .

           Mary Shelly herself attended the play and pronounced it authentic . but this ‘serious’ drama immediately inspired parodies first with  Frankenstein in 1823 a burlesque featuring a tailor , who as the “needle Prometheus”, sews a body out of nine corpses.

          A play called the man in the moon was  very popular in London during 1847 ; its script was hamlet with the addition of a new act in which the creature arises from hell through a trap  door and signs and drinks with the ghost . in more modern times Frankenstein has been a staple of many stages. Frankenstein and his bride was performed at a club called strip city in los angels in the late 1950s.

            It included songs such as “oh what a beautiful mourning” and “ ohoul of my dream”. And the rocky horror show with Richard O’Brien , first performed at the royal court theatre upstairs in London in 1973, the revived far too many times and filmed as the rocky horror picture show directed by Jim Sharman (1975).

          In it brad and janet have pledged their love but most encounter the rapacious frank-n-furter . a transvestite from the planet transsexual in the galaxy Transylvania , who has created a perfect male lover  rocky  horror , to replace his former lover Eddie . After numerous seduction . frank-n-furter  is eventually killed when the servants revolted by the hunchback Riff Raff. If it were not for VH1 I love the to s series we might all be able to forget wichiepoo and frank-n-furter .

C) Film Adaptations

             In the Frankenstein omnibus the 1931 James Whale film Frankenstein . the most famous of all adaptation . it was loosely based on the novel with the addition of new element including the placing of a criminal brain into the monster’s body.

         The 1st film version of Frankenstein . however, was produced by Thomas Edison in 1910 , a one-reel tinted silent. Albert Lavalley explain ,

“ the blindness of the range expressed toward the Monster and his half human incomprehension of It thus recaptures much of the bleak horror of the Book . its indictment of society , and its picture of Man’s troubled consciousness”

              Though Branagh tries to stick to Mary Shelley’s plot , tree-fourth of the way through , the film diverges widely from the novel and seems most interested in the love affair between victor and Elizabeth.

      And now, just for fun we offer a quick survey of a few other film version of Mary Shelly’s classic.

·        I was a teenage Frankenstein – U.S.A  directed by Herbert l.stock 1957. A British doctor  descended from Frankenstein  visits the united states as a university lecture and lives in a house with labs and alligators for organ disposal ; he uses young men far parts . the creature kills the doctor’s mistress and other on campus.

·        Torticola Contre frankensburg – France directed by Paul Paviot 1952 Lorelei , a girl forced by poverty to live with her uncle at todenwald castle meets a talking cat , a man with a cat’s brain , and a monster called Torticola whom the doctor has made  from corpses.

D)Television Adaptations

               Frankenstein has surfaced in hundreds of television adaptations including night gallery , the Addams family , the monsters , star trek : the next generation , Scooby-doo , Frankenstein and the impossible Alvin and the chipmunks , the Simpsons wishbone , and so on notable television creatures have included bosvenson , randy quaid , david warner and Ian Holm . perhaps the most authentic television version was  Frankenstein :  the true story , with script writing by Christopher Isherwood and acting by James Mason , Jane Seymour , Micheal Sarrazin and Tom Baker.ein – U.S.A  directed by Herbert l.stock 1957. A British doctor  descended from Frankenstein  visits the united states as a university lecture and lives in a house with labs and alligators for organ disposal ; he uses young men far parts . the creature kills the doctor’s mistress and other on campus.

·        Torticola Contre frankensburg – France directed by Paul Paviot 1952 Lorelei , a girl forced by poverty to live with her uncle at todenwald castle meets a talking cat , a man with a cat’s brain , and a monster called Torticola whom the doctor has made  from corpses.

Wednesday, 15 October 2014

The Importance of myth in Kanthapura


                  The Importance of myth in Kanthapura
Name : Radha B. Ghevariya 

Std. : M.A. SEM- 1

Sub : 
Indian Writing In English 
Roll no : 22 

Topic :  The Importance of myth in Kanthapura

Submitted to : Smt. S. B. Gardi Department of English 
 Introduction


           Raja Rao was born on November 8,1908 in Hassan in the state of  Mysore in South India, Raja Rao was a well-know Brahmin family. His native language was kanarese, but his post-graduate education was in France , and if all this publications in book from in English.

             Raja Rao was concerned with the colonial language . in the foreword to ‘Kanthapura’ (19380)  published in London, if then he admitted the difficulties are

“ A language that is not one’s  Own the spirit that is one’s own”
And conveying,the various shades and omissions of Certain thought movement that looks Maltreated in an alien language”

                RajaRao the novel  Kanthapura (1938) was an the impact of Gandhi’s teaching  on non-violent resistance against the British  and then Raja Rao borrows the style and structure from Indian  vernacular tales and folk epic.

                  The novel Kanthapura in the character of the young man Moorthy who comes back from the city Kanthapura , then Rao   portrays an idealist and supporter of ahinsa and satayagraha , if also create  to cross the traditional barriers of caste , as then the old women calls the ‘ university Graduate’ , and has given up his,

“Boots and hat and  suit and had taken
To dhoti and khadi , and it was said he
Had even given up his city habit of smoking”

             Raja Rao died of heart failure on  July 8,2006 . at his home in Austin , Texas .His famous work
       
# Kanthapura (1938)
#  Changing India(1939)
#  Whither India ( 1948)
#  The serpent and the rope ( 1960)


#  Summary

     Raja Rao’s Kanthapura is one of the finest novels to come out of mid twentieth century India. Raja Rao’s first  novel Kanthapura in 1938. It is the story of a village in south India named Kanthapura and also it is the story of how Gandhi’s struggle for independence from the British came to a typical village Kanthapura the novel is narrated in the form of a ‘sthalapurana’ by an old women of the village Achkka. Kanthapura is a traditional caste ridden Indian village, which is away from all modern ways of living if their the village Kanthapura then dominant castes like Brahmins are privileged to get the best region of the village like sudras, pariahs are marginalized.

           The novel Kanthapura in the main character of the novel Moorthy is a Brahmin who, discovered a half baried linga from the village and installed it. And also then the a temple is built there , which later became the centre point of the village life.  The village Kanthapura then all ceremonies and festivals are celebrated warren the temple.

           The character of Jayaramchar as a harikathamen . harikathas  is a traditional form of storytelling was practiced in village . Jayaramchar narrated a harikathas based on Gandhi and his ideas. The novel Kanthapura its  begins its course of action when Moorthy leaves for the city and he got familiar with the Gandhian philosophy  through pamphlets and other literature.  Moorthy is a discarded foreign untouchability .  and then the village and all cast man against the foreign  government and Moorthy was excommunicated and then the other character like bade khan was a police officer a non Hindu of Kanthapura . bade khan is an enemy  of the  people who refuses  to provide shelter to him. Moorthy continued his fight against injustice and social inequality way of Gandhi after that at last Moorthy release and arrest of the satayagraha  and atrocities against women added miseries of the people . then in the last part of the novel it is mentioned that  people of the village were settled in kashipura and Kanthapura was occupied by people of Bombay.

# Myth

            Myth is a imagination not a reality . myth is always comes from  past . it Raja Rao also used the myth in framework . myth always related with ideal truth and real world . the use of mythical technique means that the past is juxtaposed with the present in this way the past may serve us criticism of the present or it may be used to heighten and glorify the preset . according to Meenakshi Mukhrjee,

“ Kanthapura is again another and a
Larger attempt at creating a sthala
Purana , that is a legendary tale of
A  specific locality”
   
                       Myth always tells individual story , early  history of people, social background supernatural beings of events.

#  Importance of myth  Kanthapura

          Myth is one type of particular device that introduce cultural background and historical movement Kanthapura novel written by raja Rao . Raja Rao is using the myth in Kanthapura. The importance of myth in Kanthapura is a microcosm of the Indian society with division of people into castes, untouchability, poverty  exploitation and  foreign ruler and ruthless tyranny at their hands and then the division of the village into the Brahmin quarters the potter quarters  and so on speak of the age long caste system  and untouchability.
  Raja Rao write,    
                                      
“ There is no village in India says Raja Rao , however mean that has not a rich sthala Purana or legendry history of its own some God or god like hero has passed by the village Rama might have rested under the papal  tree…..”

             The using  central myth of Kanthapura is of ram-sita-ravana, which  is the used to illustrate the fight between Mahatma Gandhi and the British and another use of myth Siva is the three eyed god so is swaraj and parvati wooed   and won Siva through penances , so does gandhi , Endeavour,  attain independence through penances so does Gandhi Endeavour to attain independence through ordeals the myth of Kanthapura is connected with the Ramayana and Mahabharata. The independence is like sita sullied at the hands of ravana and Gandhi like rama  strives to regain her .  Gandhi’s visit to England for the round table  conference is like the  visit of ram to lanka after  Ravana’s defeat if their Gandhi is rama and  Jawaharlal Nehru is bharta. 

             In this novel Kanthapura it is a small and beautiful village of people  but who still belongs to the old world of superstition . Raja Rao use Indian myth sensibility and tradition myth in the novel. Kanthapura shares certain narrative technique with Purana. The story by a village grandmother  and the style reflect oral heritage also  represent the harikathas. In the village we see the one temple and  this temple is most important for villagers. In this temple Jayaramchar narrate ‘ Harikathas’ and many katha  related on Gandhian ideas. Raja Rao use  Indian sensibility, tradition myth mysticism , religion , techniques in the novel. Raja Rao tells us that as soon as Gandhi was born “ the four wide walls began to shine like the kingdom of the sun, and hardly was he in the cradle than the began to lisp the language of wisdom” the harikathas man Jayaramchar raises Gandhi to the level of god by his activities with one particular feat of Krishna.
“ you remember how Krishna when he was But a babe of four, had began to fight against Demons and had killed the serpent kali,so Too our Mohandas began to fight, against The enemies of the country”

Conclusion

       Raja Rao has also  used the  myth and reality in the novel ‘Kanthapura’ through their  customs, attitudes , ritual and also through their  belief about the religiosity.








Sunday, 12 October 2014

Six Part of Tragedy

                                     "Six Part Of Tragedy" 


Name : Radha B. Ghevariya 


Std. : M.A. SEM-1

Sub : literary Theory and Criticism

Roll no : 22 

Topic : 

 "Six Part Of Tragedy" 

Submitted to : Smt. S. B. Gardi Department of English 

Introduction 


                 
Aristotle the father of western criticism was versatile genious . his mind was opened to different branches of knowledge . such as politics , physics , history , logic , astrology , ethics , mathematics , biology , and literature . Aristotle had this and unquenchable thirst of knowledge . According to R . A. Scott James ,


                      “Aristotle was law giver and absolut  Monarch to the poets and critic……..”

          He was such a genious that even his master plato praised him and  humourously remark ;                  

     “ my acedamy consisted of two part  ,the body of other student and the  Brain of Aristotle”             

                   Aristotle stirred the scholars of world by presenting the illuminating ideas . his ‘poetics’ is a path breaking work which deals with his famous definition of tragedy and his ideas about poetry , plot , character.

Definition of tragedy                       

    Aristotle has given very popular the definition of tragedy in his ‘poetics’. Let us here recall his familiar definition of tragedy using Proffessor Butcher’s reclearing;


                     “Tragedy then is an imitation of an Action that is serious , complete ,    And of a certain magnitude ; in Language embellished with each Kind of artistic ornament , the Veral kinds being found in seperate Part of the play ; in the  form  of    Action not of narration ;  The pity and fear effecting the
           Proper purgation of these emotion”

                        Aristotle  provides a definition of tragedy that we can break into seven  parts : 1] it involve mimesis; 2] it is serious ; 3] the action is complete and with magnitude ;4] it is made up of language with the ‘aesthetic delight’ of rhythm and harmony ; 5] these aesthetic ornament ; are not used uniformly throughout , but are introduced in separate part of the work so that , for instance , some bits are sung ; 6] it is performed rather than narrated ; and 7] it arouse the emotions of pity and fear and accomplishes catharsis of these emotions.                

               Aristotle indicates that the medium of tragedy is drama not narrative ; tragedy ‘show’ rather than ‘tells’  and also Aristotle say that tragedy is higher and more philosophical than history because history simply realtes  what has happened while has dramatizes what may happen.


                          “what  is possible according to The law of probability or necessity”

 

Formative element of tragedy    

         Aristotle onumerates six formative element of tragedy.                       

 1] Plot ( mythos )                    

 2] Character ( ethos )                     

3] Song ( melos )                    

4] Diction ( lexis )                   

5] Thought ( Dianaia )                   

6] Spectacle ( Opsis )                

                Aristotle assert that any tragedy can be divided into six formative element and that every tragedy is made up of these six parts with nothing else beside .

1]  Plot ( Mythos)

      

                Aristotle believes that “plot  is the soul of tragedy” . According to him plot is the most important element of tragedy . he  compares plot with the soul . by this he means that human body is governed by soul . when the soul leaves the body . Aristotle says that there could be tragedy without character but not without plot . according to him , “plot is the soul of tragedy” . plot that meets this criterion will have the following qualities . the plot of Oedipus the king for an application of this  diagram Sophocles play.


                      While history thus deals with the particular and tragedy with the universal . Aristotle also defines plot as  “ the arrangement of the incident” . that is not the story itself but the way the incident are presented to the audience the structure of the play. The plot must be ‘ whole’ with a beginning , middle , and end . THE BEGINNING  called by modern critic , the incentive moment , if the cause and effect chain but not be dependent on anything outside the compass of the play. THE MIDDLE called by climax must  be caused by earlier incident and itself cause the incident that follow it . THE END called by resolution if must be caused by the preceding event but not lead to other incident outside the compass of the play. Aristotle define it as ,


                      “ The harmonious arrangement of
                         The incident …………………………….”    
                

                The cause  and effect chain of action are superior those who are depended on the character of the protagonist . certain magnitude means size or length nor too nor to short . but it should be governed by aesthetic pleasure. Aristotle divided the plot into two kinds.                         

1] Simple plot 2] Complex plot


1] Simple plot
                         

             A plot is a simple , when the change in  the fortune , of view takes place without ‘peripetia’ and ‘anagnorsis’ . ‘peripetia’ means reversal and ‘anagnorsis’ means recognizatiopn . Aristotle calls it, ‘a translation from ignorance to knowledge’. Even animinated becomes the recognition in the drama as per Aristotle.

2] Complex plot


                        A complex plot involve both ‘peripetia’ and ‘anagnorsis’. Aristotle prefers a complex plot .Aristotle believes that a complex plot  is suitable for the tragedy . complex plot takes terms or twist throughout the tragedy.  It is not the strait or linear. The audience find it interesting because a complex plot defeats the readers expectation when about the trake of a story it becomes highly interesting. because it capture the attention of the very beginning of the play . a complex plot can generate the true effect of tragedy . Aristotle also  believes in the three unities unity of time ,place and action . Aristotle believes that these unities strengthen effect of tragedy . unity of time -this unity define that the action of the play should cover within 24 hours of time .unity of place-according to Aristotle the play must have one single it means the place for the action should only one place . unity of action-this unity observes that should be only one plot, even in the sub plots generate confusion Aristotle strictly insists to avoid  the plurality.               

             The plot may be either simple or complex , although complex is better . simple plots have only a “change of fortune”. While complex plots have both “reversal of intention” and “recognition” connected with the catastrophe. Aristotle explains that a peripeteia occurs when character produces an effect opposite  to that which he intended to produce while an ansgnorsis,                      

“Is a change form ignorance to  Knowledge producing love or Hate between the persons
    Destined for good or bad fortune”

              Further, Aristotle emphasizes on action by saying that,                    

“ without action there cannot be a Tragedy ; there may be witho        C      h      a    r    a    c    t    e    r”

2] Character ( ethos )
                    

             In the respect of character Aristotle mainly finds four thing :-


1) Character should be good.
2) It  should be appropritate.
3) It should have  likeness.
4) It should  have consistency.


               The character should be good not too good or perfect.by appropritate  Aristotle  means that  they must be prove true type  . by likeness he suggests to main the character life like . by  consistency , he means that three must be no sudden charges in character .  character are men and woman who act. The hero and  heroine are two important figures.             

                  In a  perfect tragedy , character will support plot , that is personal motivations will be intricately connected parts of the cause and effect chain of actions producing pity and fear in the audience for , “pity is aroused by unmerited misfortune , fear by the misfortune of a man like ourselves” . A tragic hero should be a main of mixed character.  this misfortune  should be the result of some arron arron in his character.                 

                     “necessity or probable” characters must be logically constructed according to “the law of  probability or necessity” that governs the actions of the play. “true to life and yet more beautiful” . Aristotle uses there , ‘hamartia’ often translated ‘tragic hero’ has been the subject of much debate . the role of hamartia  in tragedy comes not form its moral status  but from the inevitability of its consequences. So , some writer think the ‘hamartia’ and ‘tragic hero’  just like this .

              * ‘Macbeth’ was noble character . but his vaiting ambitious leads him to his full . it is called tragic flaw.


             *  In the same way Hamlet’s procrastination and othello’s jealously lead them  to the disruction . in this way the characters which are  noble , but with a weakness can generate catharsis. But , these things do not constitute ‘hamartia’ in Aristotle’s sence.


3]Song(melos)


              The song is  one of these embellish . song is the musical component of tragedy . it is used to relieve the tenstion or tragic effect music is a minor element , yet it can not ignored . it is drought by performer’s art . melos means ‘melody’ and this refers to the  chorus since the chorus gives important information it should be considered an important part of the play sometime the chorus adds humoror suspense.


                 Aristotle argue that the chorus should be fully integrated into the play like an actor ; chorus odes should not be “mere interudes” . but  should contribute to the unity of the plot .


4] Diction ( lexis )                  

              Aristotle deals with diction in there chapter form 20 to 22 in ‘poetics’ . Diction is the medium of language or expression through which the characters reveals their throught and feelings . the language should not be common . metaphor and other figure of speech makes the language fit for the grand character . Diction is fourth and is ,


“The expression of the meaning in words”

              Which are proper and appropriate to the plot , character , and end of the tragedy .  in all the element Aristotle discusses the  stylistic element of tragedy ; he is particularly in metaphor ;    

 “ but the greatest thing by Is to have a command for     Metaphor ; ……………..it is the   Mark of genius , for to make Good metaphor implies  an                    Eye       for        resemblances”         

                    There is lexis , which means language
And refers to the language the character use . It should be limbic high quality .

5]Thought(Dianoia) 

      
                           Thought means power of saying , filting to occusion . it is an intellectual element in tragedy . it  is expressed through the speech of character . It is found where something is proved to be or not to be , thought  prove some particular point .


                     Thought seems to denote the intellectual qualities of an agent while character seems to denote the moral qualities of an agent .Thought that is the faculty of saying what is possible and pertinent in given circumstances .

6]Spectacle(opsis)  

             Spectacle has more relastion with  stage craft this element has least . to do with poet’s craft . spectacle related with the stage performance and but he also says that those who on spectacle creat a sense which is not of the terrible . but only of the monstrous effect ,

               “ the production of spectacular
                  Effect depends more on the
                  Art of the stage mechinist than                  On that of the port                 …………….”

              Aristotle calls spectacle the ‘ least artistic’ element of tragedy and the least connected with the work of the poet .


For example :-                   

               If the play has ‘beautiful’ costume and ‘bad’ acting and ‘bad’ story there is ‘something wrong’ with it .even though that ‘beauty, may save play it is ‘not a nice thing’ .                  

          The spectacle has indeed an emotional attraction of its own , but of all the parts , it is the least artistic , and connected least with the art of poetry .

Conclusion             

                To conclude we can say that Aristotle studied only greek tragedy . therefore a theory of tragedy might have some limitations . yet his views universally applicable . Aristotle establish scientific study of tragedy . so , Scott James rightly remarks ;


       “ In giving us this theory of tragedy
         , he has given as something very          Like a theory of fine - art”

         Thus , in ‘ the poetics’  Aristotle has given the ideas about tragedy , its essential element .
Even  Saintsbury says ;        

“It is impossible for anyone
     Who undertakes the office
            Of a critic , to omit the stud  Of Aristotle without very Great       h     a     r     m” .